Answer:
y is 1/4 when x is -1 if I did interpret your equation right. Please see that I did.
I believe the equation to be
. If you meant
, please let me know.
Thanks kindly.
Step-by-step explanation:
If (-1,y) lies on the graph of
, then by substitution we have:
.
We just need to simplify to determine y:
Multiply the 2 and -1:

Use reciprocal rule for exponents to get rid of the negative:

just means
:

.
Answer:
A = $32,652.44
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Principal (P) = 30,760.08, Annual Rate (R) = 12%, Time (t in years) = 0.5
To find: How much David needs to invest monthly
Formula: 
Solution: To find, simply add principal + interest
First, convert R as a percent to r as a decimal
r = R/100
r = 12/100
r = 0.12 rate per year,
Then solve the equation for A
A = P(1 + r/n)nt
A = 30,760.08(1 + 0.12/12)(12)(0.5)
A = 30,760.08(1 + 0.01)(6)
A = $32,652.44
Therefore;
The total amount David will obtain with 30,760.08 for 6 months, 12%is $32,652.44.
The location of the y value of R' after using the translation rule is -10
<h3>What will be the location of the y value of R' after using the translation rule? </h3>
The translation rule is given as:
(x + 4, y - 7)
The pre-image of R is located at (-17, -3)
Rewrite as
R = (-17, -3)
When the translation rule is applied, we have:
R' = (-17 + 4, -3 - 7)
Evaluate
R' = (-13, -10)
Remove the x coordinate
R'y = -10
Hence, the location of the y value of R' after using the translation rule is -10
Read more about translation at:
brainly.com/question/26238840
#SPJ1
There is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
For the nutritionist to determine whether there is an association between where food is prepared and the number of calories the food contains, there must be an association between two categorical variables.
The conditions that satisfy whether there exists an association between conditional relative frequencies are:
1. When there is a bigger difference in the conditional relative frequencies, the stronger the association between the variables.
2. When the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, there may be no association between the variables.
For the given conditional relative frequency, we can see that there exists a significant difference between the columns of the table in the picture because 0.15 is significantly different from 0.55 and 0.85 is significantly different from 0.45
We can conclude that there is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
Answer:
3x+12
Step-by-step explanation:
distribute