Answer: Batesian mimicry
Explanation: Batesian Mimicry is defined as the resemblance of one or more non-poisonous species to a poisonous species. For example, the poisonous coral snake and the harmless milk snake. It is a relationship between two organisms where one is harmless, looks almost exactly like one that is harmful.
Answer:
Happiness. Not momentary happiness, but true satisfaction at the end of your life.
Explanation:
I believe it would be <span>the high fertility rate in sub-Saharan Africa
</span>
Ethical Dimensions offers workshops which explore the multiple dimensions of ethics education. The exploration begins with a wide range of traditional concerns in areas such as codes and guidelines, confidentiality, informed consent, roles and boundaries, standards of practice, dual role relationship, and sexual misconduct. The journey then deepens and broadens into areas such as self-care, skillful communication, using power with heart, informed decision making and ethics as soul work.
Workshops interpret and present Ethics as Right Use of Power. All of the courses are held in the context of power and heart. Power is relational energy that either heals or is destructive. The forgotten beauty of power in ethics courses is often the side of power that is creative and wise ~ the side that promotes healing and empowerment. Learning to dance gracefully and skillfully within the web of our own power style is a lifetime journey. The experiential nature of the classroom experience provides a learning that is readily available in real life context. This approach guides you to a deeper connection with your own ethical nature and inner landscape.
<span>Ethical Dimensions offers continuing education for massage therapists, body workers,
</span><span>teachers and faculty on staff with massage therapy schools, and other health care providers. The educational offerings are useful to the novice as well as the seasoned practitioner. </span>
It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
