Write the explicit<br> rule for the nth term.<br> Then find a71.<br> {O, -8, -16, -24 ...}

Let n1equals50, Upper X 1equals30, n2equals50, and Upper X 2equals10. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. a. At the 0.05 leve

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

$z=\frac{0.6-0.2}{\sqrt{0.4(1-0.4)(\frac{1}{50}+\frac{1}{50})}}=4.082$

$p_v =2*P(Z>4.082)=4.46x10^{-5}$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion 1 is significantly different from proportion 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=30$ represent the number of people with a characteristic in 1

$X_{2}=10$ represent the number of people with a characteristic in 2

$n_{1}=50$ sample of 1 selected

$n_{2}=50$ sample of 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{30}{50}=0.6$ represent the proportion of people with a characteristic in 1

$p_{2}=\frac{10}{50}=0.2$ represent the proportion of people with a characteristic in 2

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion 1 is different from proportion 2 , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{30+10}{50+50}=0.4$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.6-0.2}{\sqrt{0.4(1-0.4)(\frac{1}{50}+\frac{1}{50})}}=4.082$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z>4.082)=4.46x10^{-5}$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion 1 is significantly different from proportion 2.

3 0

3 years ago

A property is listed for $580,000. The listing agreement promises to

IgorC [24]

Answer:

$26,096

Step-by-step explanation:

property taxes = 31 January + 28 February + 31 March + 30 April + 31 May + 4 June = 155 days

property taxes = (155 days/365 days) x $5,309 = $2,254

agent's commission = 7% x $547,000 = $38,290

seller's net = $547,000 - $480,000 (mortgage) - $38,290 (agent's commission) - $360 (home warranty) - $2,254 (property taxes) = $26,096

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose that g(x)=f(x)+3. Which statement best compares the graph of g(x) with the graph of f(x)?

Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

He said points

Step-by-step explanation:

I can get points for nothing

8 0

2 years ago

harvard university accepts 6 student for every 100 applications.how many students will be accepted if 850 applicants apply for a

Oksanka [162]

6\100 also equals 3/50

so in turn if 50 goes into 850 exactly 17 times we can then multiply 6 by that same variable

in turn if there were 850 applicants then 102 students would be accepted into Harvard.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When information is being gathered about a group, the entire group of objects, individuals or events is called the....

jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

so hard

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Write the explicit rule for the nth term. Then find a71. {O, -8, -16, -24 ...}