Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Total money raised = 658 + 95.60 = $ 753.60
donated to each charity = 753.60/12 = $62.80
Short answer: I don't know, but that doesn't mean I can't give you something that you can decide for yourself.
y = 4*2^(2n - 2) is the pattern.
Go for broke. Try n = 4. You should get 256. Let's try it.
y = 4 * 2^(2*4 - 2)
y = 4 * 2^(8 - 2)
y = 4 * 2^6
y = 4 * 64
y = 256 yup it works.
The other end is just as important. Suppose n = 1
Then y = 4 * 2^(2*1 - 2) = 4 * 2^0 = 4*1 = 4 Both work.
If this formula is correct, we can abbreviate it to make your task easier.
y = 4 * 2^(2n - 2)
y = 2^2 * 2^(2n - 2)
y = 2^(2n - 2 + 2)
y = 2^(2n) Now try the two end points again.
n = 4
y = 2^(2*4)
y = 2^8
y = 256
n = 1
y = 2^(2*1)
y = 2^2
y = 4 which again checks.
so y = 2^(2n) I think is an exponential function.
Sorry my explanation is so long.
Answer:
$337.05
Step-by-step explanation:
450 x (1- 0.3)= $315
$315 x (1+0.07)= $337.05
Answer:
452.2 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
A = 4πr²
A = 4 (3.14) (6)²
A = 4 (3.14) (36)
A = 452.16
A = 452.2 cm (nearest tenth)
Answer:
The test is not significant at 5% level of significance, hence we conclude that there's no variation among the discussion sections.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assumptions:
1. The sampling from the different discussion sections was independent and random.
2. The populations are normal with means and constant variance
There's no variation among the discussion sections
There's variation among the discussion sections
Df Sum Sq Mean sq F value Pr(>F)
Section 7 525.01 75 1.87 0.99986
Residuals 189 7584.11 40.13
Test Statistic = 
Since our p-value is greater than our level of significance (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there's no significant variation among the eight discussion sections.
