Answer:
50
Step-by-step explanation:
Explanation:
There may be a more direct way to do this, but here's one way. We make no claim that the statements used here are on your menu of statements.
<u>Statement</u> . . . . <u>Reason</u>
2. ∆ADB, ∆ACB are isosceles . . . . definition of isosceles triangle
3. AD ≅ BD
and ∠CAE ≅ ∠CBE . . . . definition of isosceles triangle
4. ∠CAE = ∠CAD +∠DAE
and ∠CBE = ∠CBD +∠DBE . . . . angle addition postulate
5. ∠CAD +∠DAE ≅ ∠CBD +∠DBE . . . . substitution property of equality
6. ∠CAD +∠DAE ≅ ∠CBD +∠DAE . . . . substitution property of equality
7. ∠CAD ≅ ∠CBD . . . . subtraction property of equality
8. ∆CAD ≅ ∆CBD . . . . SAS congruence postulate
9. ∠ACD ≅ ∠BCD . . . . CPCTC
10. DC bisects ∠ACB . . . . definition of angle bisector
Answer:the answer c
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:80
Assume the number to be 400 for instance,
10% of 400 increased = 400 + ( 10/100 × 400 )
= 400 + 40 = 440
The resulting number decreased by its 10% = 400 - (10/100 × 400)
= 400 - 40 = 360
Now, net decrease = 440 - 360 = 80
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
