Answer:
b= -1/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Though a variable's sign changes when it is multiplied by -1, its absolute value does not. Therefore, we can eliminate the 1:
1/5+b=0
b+1-1/5=0-1/5
b+0/5= 0 -1/5
b=0 -1/5
and you have b= -1/5 as your answer
(0,4) is the correct answer.
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
m∠C = 60°
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that sum of angles of a traingle is 18 degrees.
given
m∠A = 60°+α,
m∠B = 60°−α
we have to find m∠C
m∠A + m∠B + m∠C = 180
60°+α + 60° - α +m∠C = 180
+α and -α gets cancelled
120°+m∠C = 180
=> m∠C = 180° - 120° = 60°
Thus, measure of angle c is 60°.