I would say that there aren't really any absolute standards for truth and justice. The reason for this is that considering we're only one species that has evolved out of apes, it is really hard to say whether the way we perceive reality and discover things through science can be thought as an absolute standard for truth. From this perspective it's even harder to find an absolute standard for justice.
Answer:
It is B or A Explanation: Bc the Chinese ppl did get discrimination back then.
The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
T. This statement would be true because the bill of rights <span> helps make sure citizens' individual rights are being protected and not the government isn't able to override it's citizens and take their rights away. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Santa Anna ordered General José de Urrea to lead 550 troops to Goliad. Although several of Santa Anna's officers argued that the entire army should advance along the coast, where supplies could be gained via sea, Santa Anna instead focused on Béxar, the political center of Texas and the site of Cos's defeat.
