Answer:
5/8 is smaller.
Step-by-step explanation:
A ratio is just a different type of fraction, a 5:8 ratio means 5/8 which is 0.625. A 7:9 ratio equals 7/9 which is 0.777777
Then to compare them you see which is smaller or bigger.
0.77777 is bigger than 0.625 so we know that 0.77777777 which was the 7:9 ratio is the bigger one.
Answer:
red side is a leg and should be labeled a or b, the pink side is a leg and should be labeled a or b, and the light blue side is the hypotenuse and should be labeled c.
3=a or b
4=a or b
5=c
Step-by-step explanation:
On the first day of school last year, Cody was 148.5 cm tall.
Let us assume then that the center is the origin. If the major axis is 18, then a = 9 and a^2=81. If the minor axis is 16, then b = 8 and b^2=64. Now you can write the equation. Remember that this ellipse is vertical and so a^2 goes under y^2
These are two questions and two answers.
1) Problem 17.
(i) Determine whether T is continuous at 6061.
For that you have to compute the value of T at 6061 and the lateral limits of T when x approaches 6061.
a) T(x) = 0.10x if 0 < x ≤ 6061
T (6061) = 0.10(6061) = 606.1
b) limit of Tx when x → 6061.
By the left the limit is the same value of T(x) calculated above.
By the right the limit is calculated using the definition of the function for the next stage: T(x) = 606.10 + 0.18 (x - 6061)
⇒ Limit of T(x) when x → 6061 from the right = 606.10 + 0.18 (6061 - 6061) = 606.10
Since both limits and the value of the function are the same, T is continuous at 6061.
(ii) Determine whether T is continuous at 32,473.
Same procedure.
a) Value at 32,473
T(32,473) = 606.10 + 0.18 (32,473 - 6061) = 5,360.26
b) Limit of T(x) when x → 32,473 from the right
Limit = 5360.26 + 0.26(x - 32,473) = 5360.26
Again, since the two limits and the value of the function have the same value the function is continuos at the x = 32,473.
(iii) If T had discontinuities, a tax payer that earns an amount very close to the discontinuity can easily approach its incomes to take andvantage of the part that results in lower tax.
2) Problem 18.
a) Statement Sk
You just need to replace n for k:
Sk = 1 + 4 + 7 + ... (3k - 2) = k(3k - 1) / 2
b) Statement S (k+1)
Replace
S(k+1) = 1 + 4 + 7 + ... (3k - 2) + [ 3 (k + 1) - 2 ] = (k+1) [ 3(k+1) - 1] / 2
Simplification:
1 + 4 + 7 + ... + 3k - 2+ 3k + 3 - 2] = (k + 1) (3k + 3 - 1)/2
k(3k - 1)/ 2 + (3k + 1) = (k + 1)(3k+2) / 2
Do the operations on the left side and you will find it can be simplified to k ( 3k +1) (3 k + 2) / 2.
With that you find that the left side equals the right side which is a proof of the validity of the statement by induction.
