Answer:
Assuming that the elimination of frequent-flyer programs would have enabled the airlines to earn higher profits and remain in business, then it would be a purely good idea for the airlines to eliminate their frequent-flyer programs.
The big question is, how much did the frequent-flyer programs cost the airlines? Would the cost-savings be sufficient to eliminate their bankruptcies? It is a known-fact that the airlines that create such programs always recover the program costs by charging higher fares.
Explanation:
The issue of airlines going bankruptcy does not seem to stem from customer-loyalty programs like the frequent-flyer programs. The root cause lies in operational and other costs that airline managements have not been able to control.
Answer:
c. $20,416.50
Explanation:
Cost of assets = 20,000
Depreciation year 1 = 33% * 20,000 = $6,666
Annual cost saving = 25,000
Tax rate = 25%
Operating cash flow Year 1 = Cost saving*(1 - tax) + Tax*Depreciation
Operating cash flow Year 1 = 25,000*(1-0.25) + 0.25*6,666
Operating cash flow Year 1 = 25,000*0.75 + 0.25*6,666
Operating cash flow Year 1 = 18750 + 1666.5
Operating cash flow Year 1 = $20,416.5
So, the cash-flow from the project in year 1 is $20,416.50
Answer:
the value that should be saved is $4,001.82
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be saved at the year end of 5 years in that case where the rate of interest is 4.5% is shown below:
Value in 5 years is
= (1 + rate) × Annual Payment × [{(1 + rate)number of years - 1} ÷ rate]
= (1 + 0.045) × $700 × [{(1 + 0.045)^5 - 1} ÷ 0.045]
= $731.50 × [0.2462 ÷ 0.045]
= $731.50 *×5.4707
= $4,001.82
Hence, the value that should be saved is $4,001.82
Answer:
The answer: ''In other words, it examines how actions and events involving top executives, firms and industries influence a firm's success or failure'' is correct.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the field of business the managers tend to be very agressive and competitive in order to set their companies in the top of the industry and therefore to obtain the maximun profits as possible.
To continue, the strategic management group wonder themself why do some firms outperform other firms and the answer to that question has many factors that influece the situation where that happens, in other words, it is normal that many companies with less resources, such as money or human knowledge, tend to give a worst performance that other companies that count with executives with huge experience or better economic situations in the industry. Moreover, it is known that the companies with a manager that knows how to manage the business with the resources it has and how to comprehend the situation where it heads will perform at a higher level than the other.
