1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sashaice [31]
3 years ago
14

What are the qualifications for stephen censky and sonny perdue for the us department of agriculture?

Law
1 answer:
Kay [80]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hey lemme go back to my quiz and check it out

You might be interested in
3. Which of the following is a primary objective for preventive patrols?
otez555 [7]

Answer :  A  

Explanation:

it would also help alot if u googled some of this stuff it would tell u more about it

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following types of agency relationships would have to be evidenced by a record to be valid? a. A power of attorney
Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Option d. All of the above must be evidenced by a record for the agent to have authority

Explanation:

A power of attorney is a written authorization to represent or act on another's behalf in private affairs, business, or some other legal matter. The person authorizing is the principal while the person authorized to act is the agent or the attorney-in-fact. An agency relationship is a relationship where the principal allows an agent to act on his or her behalf.

Since all of the above are agency contracts, they must be evidenced by a record to be valid. There must be a legally binding document between the principal and the agent for the relationship to be valid.

7 0
3 years ago
I used to be in a speech and debate class if anyone wants to help me practice debating I am here.
kherson [118]

This probably is not quite what you're looking for, but I have listed debating techniques:

Judges generally score the speakers looking at this criteria:

Content / Matter - What the debaters say, their arguments and evidence, the relevance of their arguments.

Style / Manner - How the debaters speak, including the language and tone used.

Strategy / Method - The structure of the speech, the clarity and responding to other's arguments.

SKILLS:

Your points must be relevant to the topic.

Provide evidence whenever you can and not your personal opinion.

You must put aside your personal views and remain objective when you debate so your argument remains logical. You can be passionate about a topic but interest can turn into aggression and passion can turn into upset.

Consider the audience's attention span - make it interesting, for example, don't just present lots of complicated statistics.

Use rhetoric to persuade - consider using the three pillars of rhetoric:

Ethos - the ethical appeal

Pathos - the emotional appeal

Logos - the logical appeal

Use notes but keep them brief and well organized. Use a different piece of paper for rebuttals.

Similar to looking at conclusions to create rebuttals, think comparatively by asking yourself "How does my plan compare to what's happening now/what would happen in the world if the other team won?" You can win the debate if you can make comparative claims about why your arguments matter more than the other team.

Only tell jokes if you're naturally good at it otherwise this can backfire.

Flexibility is important because you might get allocated the side of the argument you don't agree with. You'll have to work hard to overcome your views. Also use this insight to think of the potential arguments you might make and then plan for counter arguments.

Voice

Speak clearly and concisely.

You must talk fast enough to have the time to deliver your speech but slow enough so you can be understood.

Project your voice to the back of the room.

Incorporate pauses.

Emphasize important words and vary your tone appropriately.

Confidence

Have a relaxed pose and posture.

Avoid filler words.

Know your material.

Emphasize using gestures.

Maintain eye contact with the audience.

Language

Keep your language simple to avoid confusion.

Refer to the opposite side as: "My opponent".

When making a rebuttal say: "My opponent said..., however..."

Don't exaggerate - avoid the words "never" or "always" etc.

Avoid saying that a speaker "is wrong", instead say that "your idea is mistaken".

What to avoid

Falsifying, making up or altering evidence.

Attacking a speaker rather than an idea.

Acting aggressively or offensively towards debaters, judges, audience etc.

Interrupting other debaters as this can suggest that your argument isn't very strong.

Disagreeing with facts or obvious truths.

There are common flaws you can look for to form a rebuttal:

1. False dichotomy

2. Assertion

3. Morally flawed

4. Correlation rather than causation

5. Failure to deliver promises

6. Straw man

7. Contradiction

8. Compare the conclusion to reality

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do court cases cost hundreds of thousands of dollars? Choose all that apply.
Andrej [43]

Answer:

i think it is D all of the choices

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Monetary award given to the plaintiff, acknowledging a defendant was in
erastova [34]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

nominal damages

"The purpose of nominal damages is to show in court records that the defendant’s conduct was wrong while concluding that no real harm was done."

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Liability that can occur when a person’s careless and inattentive actions cause harm is called
    9·1 answer
  • If a food service worker follows directions, how long does it take to wash his/her hands?
    9·1 answer
  • The fordney-mccumber act of 1922 helped boost the american economy by
    12·1 answer
  • What happens when you file a lawsuit?
    5·1 answer
  • Vaccine Passports: Good or bad public policy?
    10·2 answers
  • Do you think Americans have too much or too little freedom of speech? Explain
    15·2 answers
  • In general, how has the power of the federal and the state governments changed over the course of the country's
    12·1 answer
  • Describe one factor that increases the likelihood for the supreme court to accept an appeal.
    10·1 answer
  • How can the principle of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victim
    9·1 answer
  • ——-Heighten aggressive or hostile behavior and distort the drivers decision making process
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!