Answer:
-21 kJ·mol⁻¹
Explanation:
Data:
H₃O⁺ + OH⁻ ⟶ 2H₂O
V/mL: 50 50
c/mol·dm⁻³: 1.0 1.0
ΔT = 4.5 °C
C = 4.184 J·°C⁻¹g⁻¹
C_cal = 50 J·°C⁻¹
Calculations:
(a) Moles of acid
So, we have 0.050 mol of reaction
(b) Volume of solution
V = 50 dm³ + 50 dm³ = 100 dm³
(c) Mass of solution
(d) Calorimetry
There are three energy flows in this reaction.
q₁ = heat from reaction
q₂ = heat to warm the water
q₃ = heat to warm the calorimeter
q₁ + q₂ + q₃ = 0
nΔH + mCΔT + C_calΔT = 0
0.050ΔH + 100×4.184×4.5 + 50×4.5 = 0
0.050ΔH + 1883 + 225 = 0
0.050ΔH + 2108 = 0
0.050ΔH = -2108
ΔH = -2108/0.0500
= -42 000 J/mol
= -42 kJ/mol
This is the heat of reaction for the formation of 2 mol of water
The heat of reaction for the formation of mol of water is -21 kJ·mol⁻¹.
The alkali metals are so reactive that they are never found in nature in elemental form. Although some of their ores are abundant, isolating them from their ores is somewhat difficult. For these reasons, the group 1 elements were unknown until the early 19th century, when Sir Humphry Davy first prepared sodium (Na) and potassium (K) by passing an electric current through molten alkalis. (The ashes produced by the combustion of wood are largely composed of potassium and sodium carbonate.) Lithium (Li) was discovered 10 years later when the Swedish chemist Johan Arfwedson was studying the composition of a new Brazilian mineral. Cesium (Cs) and rubidium (Rb) were not discovered until the 1860s, when Robert Bunsen conducted a systematic search for new elements. Known to chemistry students as the inventor of the Bunsen burner, Bunsen’s spectroscopic studies of ores showed sky blue and deep red emission lines that he attributed to two new elements, Cs and Rb, respectively. Francium (Fr) is found in only trace amounts in nature, so our knowledge of its chemistry is limited. All the isotopes of Fr have very short half-lives, in contrast to the other elements in group 1.
Since there is so little information given, I will assume that we are at STP and i can use the conversion factor at STP--->> 22.4 Liters= 1 mol of gas
before we use this conversion, we need to convert the grams to moles using the molar mass of the molecule.
molar mass of Cl₂= 35.5 x 2= 71.0 g/ mol
177.3 g (1 mol/ 71.0 g)= 2.50 mol Cl₂
then we use the conversion to get the volume
2.50 mol Cl₂ (22.4 Liters/ 1 mol)= 55.9 Liters
Answer:
The main advantage would be that with the pouring temperature being much higher, there is very little chance that the metal will solidify in the mould while busy pouring. This will allow for moulds that are quite intricate to still be fully filled. The drawbacks, though, include an increased chance defects forming which relates to shrinkage (cold shots, shrinkage pores, etc). Another drawback includes entrained air being present, due to the viscosity of the metal being low because of the high pouring temperature.
