Answer:
Anne is outgoing, talkative, and sensitive. She always remains optimistic about her family's situation throughout their ordeal. Peter is quiet and rarely expresses his personal thoughts and feelings. Anne sees herself as accomplishing something great in life, while Peter says he wants to be a gambler or just loaf around. Anne spends some of her time studying, while Peter sees his studies as a boring requirement. Anne is reflective about her strengths and weaknesses while being self-confident about what kind of woman she wants to become. Peter obviously has not given that much thought to his future.
The author wanted to show these differences because it reveals that they don't really fit each other's personality very well and they can't really relate to a lot of things, but they love each other.
Answer:
Mark has formed a dispositional attribution
Explanation:
A dispositional attribution consists in assigning the outcome of an event to internal personality factors.
In this example, Mark has observed that Juan is a good team leader in basketball practice. Instead of thinking that Juan is a good leader because the game requires him to act in such a way (this would be an example of a situational attribution), he considers that Juan is himself a good leader, because he has the personality characteristics of one, regarless of the situation in which he might be involved.
A tyrant would want to convince the people not to insist on democracy. He could use arguments such as:
Democracy will make the country weak and vulnerable to outside attacks
Democracy will not be an efficient form of government because people would argue too much
His rule is better because it provides stability
Answer:
By 1863, however, the Northern military plan consisted of five major goals: Fully blockade all Southern coasts. This strategy, known as the Anaconda Plan, would eliminate the possibility of Confederate help from abroad. Control the Mississippi River.
Explanation:
The right lane.
:) Hope this helps!!
