Answer:8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
First option: The slope is negative for both functions.
Fourth option: The graph and the equation expressed are equivalent functions.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
The missing graph is attached.</h3><h3>
</h3>
The equation of the line in Slope-Intercept form is:

Where "m" is the slope and "b" is the y-intercept.
Given the equation:

We can identify that:

Notice that the slope is negative.
We can observe in the graph that y-intercept of the other linear function is:

Then, we can substitute this y-intercept and the coordinates of a point on that line, into
and solve for "m".
Choosing the point
, we get:

Notice that the slope is negative.
Therefore, since the lines have the same slope and the same y-intercept, we can conclude that they are equivalent.
Answer:
Yes, I can reject the null hypothesis with 95% confidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Critical value t(63) = 1.99
p-value = 0.03
Confidence level (C) = 95% = 0.95
Significance level = 1 - C = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05
Conclusion:
Reject the null hypothesis because the p-value 0.03 is less than the significance level 0.05.
Answer:
Follows are the solution to the given question:
Step-by-step explanation:
There are missing details, which is why its solution is as follows:
When an angle bisector points so, its two sides of the corner are equidistant. Its corner bisector of a triangle angle is a straight line splitting its angle into two congruent directions. In such a single point, calling its incentives, follow three-angle engineers are required of its three triangle angles.
Answer: it's the third one and the first one
Step-by-step explanation: