Answer:
The minimum number of years that Lloyd must remain a member of the ADLA so that the lifetime membership is cheaper (on a present value basis) than paying the annual membership dues is 23 years.
Explanation:
The question is incomplete.
<em>Lloyd is a divorce attorney who practices law in Florida. He wants to join the American Divorce Lawyers Association (ADLA), a professional organization for divorce attorneys. The membership dues for the ADLA are $600 per year and must be paid at the beginning of each year. For instance, membership dues for the first year are paid today, and dues for the second year are payable one year from today. However, the ADLA also has an option for members to buy a lifetime membership today for $6,500 and never have to pay annual membership dues. Obviously, the lifetime membership isn't a good deal if you only remain a member for a couple of years, but if you remain a member for 40 years, it's a great deal. Suppose that the appropriate annual interest rate is 7.4%. What is the minimum number of years that Lloyd must remain a member of the ADLA so that the lifetime membership is cheaper (on a present value basis) than paying $600 in annual membership dues?</em>
<em />
We have to equal the price of the lifetime membership with the present value of the annual membership. The anual membership present value is equal to a annuityof n years.
Answer:
- True
- False
- True
- True
Explanation:
When an economy has a strong balance sheet and a declining budget deficit, it means that there is less need to borrow from the market which would keep rates lower.
When the economy is weakening, the Fed will try to stimulate it by engaging in actions that weaken short term interest rates so that people and businesses can borrow at lower cost and invest or buy goods and services.
When investors are worried about the riskiness of other financial assets, they usually come to safer assets like U.S. Treasury bonds so that they do not lose money and this is what happened in the credit crisis of 2008. More demand for the bonds led to a rise in their price.
Answer:
The multiple choices are as follows:
a.
25.40%
b.
29.03%
c.
39.25%
d.
33.98%
e.
27.38%
The correct option is C,39.25% federal tax rate
Explanation:
In determining the federal tax that one would be indifferent in choosing between the two bonds, we equate the yield of the two bonds as follows with tax element being deducted from corporate bond yield:
6.50%=10.70%*(1-t)
The t is the tax rate which is the unknown
divide both sides by 10.70%
6.50%/10.70%=1-t
0.607476636
=1-t
t=1-0.607476636
t=0.392523364
=39.25%
I would think 78,956 because you have to think about what you would put in there like water heaters and septic and water pipes you really have to think about for electricity all kinds of stuff would drive the bill more, and more
Answer:
The court will rule in favor of Judy
Explanation:
Kristy made a valid offer to Judy and Judy accepted it before Dave accepted Kristy´s offer so Judy's acceptance should prevail.
In the offer letter, Kristy told Judy to "please respond to Bruce Townsend", but she did not specify that the only proper mode of acceptance was the response to Bruce. Since she did not specify that Judy could not respond directly to her, Judy's letter of acceptance to Kristy's offer is valid.
Kristy should have been more specific in stating that the only proper mode of acceptance was a response to Bruce.