1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
3 years ago
5

Center of dilation: scale factor: ASAP I NEED HELP PLS

Mathematics
1 answer:
vampirchik [111]3 years ago
8 0
Its scale dilation scale factor.
You might be interested in
The surface area of a cube is 864 in.2. Find the volume of the cube
Sveta_85 [38]
As the cube has 6 faces the area of one face  will be 864 / 6 = 144 in^2

so each edge = 12 in  

Volume of cube = 12^3 =   1728 in^3
3 0
4 years ago
I need to figure out how to find proportionality in a equation
Alla [95]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:to find the proportionlity it has to go through the origin (0,0) and has to be a straight line on a graph but, in a model label your measurements as x1 ,y1 ,x2, y2 because y2-y1/x2-x1 should give u a answer then do y/x

5 0
3 years ago
I neeeeeed help RIGHT NOW​
Alborosie

Answer:

A. Raheem

Step-by-step explanation:

it can't be any of the answers that have addition because -4 has to move up 8 spaces on the y axis to get to +4 and -2 needs to move up 4 spaces to get to +2 and you can only use 1 rule so A is correct

please give me brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
In a study comparing various methods of gold plating, 7 printed circuit edge connectors were gold-plated with control-immersion
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

99% confidence interval for the difference between the mean thicknesses produced by the two methods is [0.099 μm , 0.901 μm].

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a study comparing various methods of gold plating, 7 printed circuit edge connectors were gold-plated with control-immersion tip plating. The average gold thickness was 1.5 μm, with a standard deviation of 0.25 μm.

Five connectors were masked and then plated with total immersion plating. The average gold thickness was 1.0 μm, with a standard deviation of 0.15 μm.

Firstly, the pivotal quantity for 99% confidence interval for the difference between the population mean is given by;

                              P.Q. = \frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } }  ~ t__n__1+_n__2-2

where, \bar X_1 = average gold thickness of control-immersion tip plating = 1.5 μm

\bar X_2 = average gold thickness of total immersion plating = 1.0 μm

s_1 = sample standard deviation of control-immersion tip plating = 0.25 μm

s_2 = sample standard deviation of total immersion plating = 0.15 μm

n_1 = sample of printed circuit edge connectors plated with control-immersion tip plating = 7

n_2 = sample of connectors plated with total immersion plating = 5

Also, s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)s_2^{2}  }{n_1+n_2-2} }   =  \sqrt{\frac{(7-1)\times 0.25^{2}+(5-1)\times 0.15^{2}  }{7+5-2} }  = 0.216

<em>Here for constructing 99% confidence interval we have used Two-sample t test statistics as we don't know about population standard deviations.</em>

So, 99% confidence interval for the difference between the mean population mean, (\mu_1-\mu_2) is ;

P(-3.169 < t_1_0 < 3.169) = 0.99  {As the critical value of t at 10 degree of

                                              freedom are -3.169 & 3.169 with P = 0.5%}  

P(-3.169 < \frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } < 3.169) = 0.99

P( -3.169 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } < {(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)} < 3.169 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } ) = 0.99

P( (\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-3.169 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } < (\mu_1-\mu_2) < (\bar X_1-\bar X_2)+3.169 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } ) = 0.99

<u>99% confidence interval for</u> (\mu_1-\mu_2) =

[ (\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-3.169 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } , (\bar X_1-\bar X_2)+3.169 \times {s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}  } } ]

= [ (1.5-1.0)-3.169 \times {0.216\sqrt{\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{5}  } } , (1.5-1.0)+3.169 \times {0.216\sqrt{\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{5}  } } ]

= [0.099 μm , 0.901 μm]

Therefore, 99% confidence interval for the difference between the mean thicknesses produced by the two methods is [0.099 μm , 0.901 μm].

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
$25 for a shirts $30 for a bag $40 get 10% ON WHAT YOU PURCHASE MARLIN BOUGHT 1 BAG 2 SHIRTS 2 PANTS
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer: The question is incomplete.

Step-by-step explanation: I cannot give you the answer because i do not know the price of the pants.

.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which module is not a function?
    6·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Turn 3.7105425043 into a fraction
    10·1 answer
  • Solve the inequality 4(a+6) &gt;= 5(a+3)
    11·1 answer
  • The sum of two numbers is 52 . The smaller number is 16 less than the larger number.What are the numbers?
    11·2 answers
  • |-9c|=8 and solve for c
    10·1 answer
  • Which quadratic equation would be used to solve for the unknown dimensions?
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone help me fill in the ratio table please!!
    6·1 answer
  • Write a story that can be represented by the equation<br> y=x+<br> 5*.
    6·1 answer
  • Question 5 please and thank you
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!