Answer:
They expected independence would fail and fearful of British retaliation.
Explanation:
Answer:
1 Hosea (Osee) 8th century BC (before the fall of the Northern Kingdom)
2 Joel (Disputed)
3 Amos 8th century BC (before the fall of the Northern Kingdom)
4 Obadiah (Abdias) (Disputed)
5 Jonah (Jonas) (Disputed)
6 Micah (Micheas) 8th century BC (before the fall of the Northern Kingdom)
7 Nahum 7th century BC (before the fall of the Southern Kingdom)
8 Habakkuk (Habacuc) 7th century BC (before the fall of the Southern Kingdom)
9 Zephaniah (Sophanias) 7th century BC (before the fall of the Southern Kingdom)
10 Haggai (Aggeus) 6th century BC (after return from exile)
11 Zechariah (Zacharias) 6th century BC (after return from exile)
12 Malachi (Malachias) 5th century BC (after return from exile)
Explanation:
On November 29, 1864, 700 militiamen from the Colorado Territory launched an assault on communities inhabited by Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians. U.S. Army Col. John Chivington, a Methodist minister and a freemason, served as the militia's commander.
<h3>What was the cause of the Sand Creek Massacre?</h3>
The long-running struggle for dominance of eastern Colorado's Great Plains was one of the main factors leading to the Sand Creek Massacre. Ownership of the region north of the Arkansas River and up to the Nebraska border was secured by the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851, which also included the Cheyenne and Arapahoe.
Around 160 men, women, and children, including the elderly and infirm, were killed in a surprise attack by the U.S. Army on a non-combatant encampment of Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians in 1864 at the Big Sandy Creek in southeast Colorado.
Learn more about The Sand Creek Massacre here:
brainly.com/question/7245604
#SPJ4
<span>
<span><span>
<span>
The evidence of his claim is the language of Nuances in Word Meanings. This is because he uses quotations to start and end his excerpt. This will organize the paragraph and put them into their right meanings. This will also simplify the quote and support the main idea.</span></span></span></span>
Answer: c. split ticket
Explanation:
A Split ticket type of voting is used to describe a scenario where a person votes for different candidates from different political parties. Indeed this is where the term gets its name, split meaning that the votes are split between parties.
For instance, voting Republican for President, Democrat for Senator and then Republican for House of Representative.
This is usually done because the voter believes in the individual rather than the party and this is what happened in the scenario described.
