Answer:
Explained below
Explanation:
American independence brought Democracy to the United States. People followed the rule of government strictly based on Constitution. One of the initial key features was the voting right in the federal elections granted to the citizens: who were at least 21 years old. This restriction was resolved through Constitutional Amendments extending the voting privilege to any citizen who is at least 18 years old meeting the essential criteria mentioned in the law.
1) The Fifteenth Amendment (1870) gave African-American men the right to vote.
"right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
2) The Nineteenth Amendment (1920) assures each and every American women the right to vote.
“the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
3) The Twenty-sixth Amendment (1971) lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.
“the right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.”
Hence, US has witnessed remarkable changes to ensure "every eligible American citizen's civic responsibility to vote."
Answer:Bobby no way this is you hahah
Explanation:
Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea while the Pena family is wary of the new law.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
From the information, Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea because it will reduce the pollution that has had a negative impact on his family. On the other hand, the Pena family is wary of the new law. It will be expensive for them to comply with it.
They worry that they will have to lower their other costs to meet the cost of compliance. They will either have to donate less to charities or lay off some of their employees.
Learn more about law on:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
<u>Complete question:</u>
Brian and his family have lived next to a factory for more than 15 years. Brian works at the factory. Although he finds it convenient that his workplace is within walking distance, he’s worried about the negative effect of the pollution caused by the factory on his family. His children have developed asthma, and he and his wife consistently get respiratory illnesses every year. Last night, he saw on the news that the government has just passed a law that limits the amount of pollution every factory in his state can emit. Brian is hopeful now that his family’s health will begin to improve.
Situation 2
The Peña family has owned the local factory for generations. The Penas believe they are good corporate neighbors. They employ many people from the neighborhood, pay their taxes in full and on time, and donate to many charities. When they hear that the government has passed a law that requires companies to limit the amount of pollution they emit, the Penas get a little tense. They realize that it will cost them a huge amount of money to bring their factory into compliance. This expense will make the factory less profitable for them. To offset that loss of profit, they may have to donate less to the charities. They also worry they will not be able to employ as many people.
How do the attitudes of Brian and the Pena family toward the new law differ?
Answer:Some families have no choice because they need to go to work.
Explanation:
!/3 of parents in 3 states may not send their children to school.
- Michigan
- Ohio
- Illinois
Answer:
conflict theory: A social science perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.
Does this help?
