Answer:
Cylinder. The explanation is not very exact, more intuition and whatnot, so let me know if there was anything you did not understand.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is assuming the rectangle has its sides parallel with the x and y axes.
Let's try to eliminate them one by one. A cone does not seem likely since it has slanted sides, and spinning the two straight sides will keep the sides straight. This can be used for the pyramid as well. Let me know if this doesn't make sense though.
Now for me I would imagine that rectangle being a sheet of paper, or metal. if you set that sheet atop some dirt or something and then rotated it, what shape would be drawn into the material? It would be a circle. So we know the 3d shapewill have a base of a circle, which leaves us with a cylinder. Again, let me know if this method did not make sense.
Answer:
7.2 million dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
The domain of the function the complete set of possible values of the independent variable. In this case the domain includes all real numbers except 189.
From;
T(p) = 0.50 (p - 189)
When p = 203.4 million dollars
T(p) = 0.50 (203.4 - 189)
T(p) = 7.2 million dollars
Answer:
Use the normal distribution if the population standard deviation is known.
Use the student's t distribution when the population standard deviation is unknown.
Explanation:
A mound-shaped distribution refers to the normal distribution.
A good sample size for testing against the normal distribution should be
n >= 30.
The condition for the sample size is satisfied.
However, we are not given the population standard deviation, therefore it is assumed to be unknown.
Therefore the student's t distribution should be used.
Answer:
B. The width of the confidence interval would be smaller.
Step-by-step explanation:
By reducing the confidence level from 99% to 95%, the student assumes that there is more uncertainty about the new confidence interval than the previous one. That, being said, since the results aren't as certain, the confidence interval is widened towards a central average point because the new interval isn't as accurate.
Therefore, the answer is B. The width of the confidence interval would be smaller.
