Henry was thinking of a number Henry halves it and gets a an answer of 12.4 what was the original number

1 answer:

jeka943 years ago

3 0

Answer: 24.8
Explanation: If Henry is halving a number, that means he's dividing it by 2, getting two halves. You would get the original number by undoing that division, or multiplying the product by 2.
2 x 12.4 = 24.8

You might be interested in

Can someone please explain to me how to tell if a number it's prime or not

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

A prime number is a number that can only be divided by 1 and itself.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the slope of the line graphed on the coordinate plane

Mice21 [21]

Answer:

The slope = 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

$m=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }$

$m=\frac{6-3}{2-(-2)}=\frac{6-3}{2+2}$

m = 3/4

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When June sits down today to read she notices she is on page 20 of a 200 page book. She decides to read 4 pages of this book eve

Olegator [25]

The answer is b. 60 || 4x10=40, 40+20=60

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many natural numbers N have the property among 1,2,..........,N exactly 30% are divisible by 3?

k0ka [10]

Answer:

The answer is B. 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that for N = 1 and N = 2, none of them are divisible by 3.

For N = 3, 33.33% are divisible by 3. For N = 4, 25% (which is already less than 30%), so N = 5 would also be less.

At N = 6, we're back up to 33.33%. N = 7 is already less than 30%.

At N = 9, you guessed it, 33.33%. N = 10 is 30% (3, 6, and 9). So we have one case.

Moving along, at N = 18, 33.33%. N = 20 is again 30% (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18). Two cases now.

Finally, at N = 21, again 33.33%. N = 22 and N = 23 are both greater than 30%. As we continue this, for any N after 20, we will always be greater than 30%.

4 0

3 years ago

The amount A of the radioactive element radium in a sample decays at a rate proportional to the amount of radium present. Given

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

a) $\frac{dm}{dt} = -k\cdot m$ , b) $m(t) = m_{o}\cdot e^{-\frac{t}{\tau} }$ , c) $m(t) = 10\cdot e^{-\frac{t}{2438.155} }$ , d) $m(300) \approx 8.842\,g$