Answer:
Answer: He supported the creation of a national bank.
Explanation:
George Washington wanted a central bank because he saw it as a good instrument to run ordely and properly public finances, regulating tax, banknotes, tranfers and currency issues. The topic of a central bank created division within the government. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison opposed the idea because the Constitution did not give that power to the federal government. Nevertheless , Alexander Hamiton argued, based on the Constitution, that it was a "necessary and proper" authority for the bank for the sake of good government.
In shaping, the behavior to be acquired is called the "target behavior", and people are rewarded for "successive approximations of" that behavior.
A target behavior is any conduct that has been picked or 'focused' for change. A target behavior ought to be positive. That implies that the objective conduct should center around what you might want the youngster to do rather than what you don't need the kid to do.
Answer:
spurious
Explanation:
When it is observed that the change in one variable corresponds to the change in another variable but the change in the first variable is not the cause of the change in the other variable.
The change in the other variable is caused due to another variable. The third variable changes due to the change in the first variable and the second variable changes due to the change in the third variable.
This type of correlation is said to spurious.
Answer:
Gold Rush
Explanation:
Because a lot of people where coming to California at this time to become rich during the Gold Rush, so as a result people need places to stay and live at this time so it became a boom town.
Answer:
An Ethical Dilemma Problem
Throughout history it has been the practice in many countries to use convicts in scientific experiments or studies. One research group has developed a chemical that preliminary tests indicate that it will cure a fatal disease that affects many people. This group wants to seek volunteers from the prison population to advance their study. They would administer the chemical to consenting prisoners and monitor its effects on the human body.
No study of this type is ever risk free, but the researchers have designed a protocol that they believe minimizes it for the prisoners. Because there can always be unexpected consequences, including illness or death, participants are offered special privileges during the testing period and possible reduction in their sentences after the conclusion of the study. Since, some of the prisoners consenting to be treated for a long period of time with higher doses of the chemical than the other participants, this group is offered full pardons at the conclusion of the study as an inducement to consent. The research group has proposed its study to those in charge of the prison and these administrators must decide whether to allow the study. If John Stuart Mill was presented with this study proposal what would he determine? That is, from his Utilitarian perspective, would Mill claim this program is moral? Use his ideas and evaluate this program from his perspective and note how he would advise the administrators.
Explanation:
