Answer:C. A machine operator is promoted to department supervisor
Explanation:
1. The loan.
2. The use of farming tools and technology.
3. Training and a focus on farming education.
4. The ability to water.
5. Farming together.
6. Research and new ideas.
7. The commercialization of farming.
8. The diversification of crops.
Answer:
<h2>Democracy </h2>
<h3>A democracy means rule by the people. The name is used for different forms of government, where the people can take part in the decisions that affect the way their community is run. The people elect their leaders. These leaders take this decision about laws. This is commonly called representative democracy. A democracy is the government elected by the people, from among the people themselves. The Army is integral in protecting the country, but it is not elected by the people; hence, it cannot form a democratic government. A democracy is a form of government that empowers the people to exercise political control, limits the power of the head of state, provides for the separation of powers between governmental entities, and ensures the protection of natural rights and civil liberties. In practice, democracy takes many different forms.</h3>
<h2>EXAMPLES:</h2>
<h3>1. If you are opposed to democracy, you do not believe every individual has a voice.</h3>
<h3>2.We use democracy as a method of selecting representatives.</h3>
<h3>3.In point of fact, bourgeois democracy is the political formula for free trade, nothing more.</h3>
<h3>4.The widespread belief in the robustness of the rule of law in Britain certainly reflects our</h3><h3> reputation as a vibrant multicultural democracy.</h3>
<h3>5.A nobility of this kind often gave way to a democracy which either proved as turbulent as itself, or else grew into an oligarchy ruling under democratic forms. Thus at Florence the old nobles became the opposite to a privileged class.</h3>
<h2>please give me brainliest. thank you</h2>
Answer:
<em>n</em><em>e</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>f</em><em>f</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>v</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>y</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
<em>t</em><em>a</em><em>m</em><em>m</em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>f</em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>m</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em><em>s</em>
<em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>g</em><em>h</em><em>t</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>a</em><em>m</em><em>m</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>h</em><em>i</em><em>b</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>l</em><em>a</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em>l</em><em>y</em>
<em>h</em><em>i</em><em>g</em><em>h</em><em> </em><em>d</em><em>e</em><em>g</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>f</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>f</em><em>f</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>v</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>y</em><em>.</em>
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.