Answer:
What was the rate of return to an investor in the fund?
10%
Explanation:
To calculate the Rate of Return it's necessary to find the variation of the Net Assets Value during the year plus the distributions of income, the result of this it's divided by the Start of Year Net Asset Value.
Rate of Return = (Var NAV + Distributions) / Start of Year NAV
Rate of Return =
($13,2 - $14,0) = -$0,80
+ Distributions = $2,2 /
Start of Year NAV = $14,0
Rate of Return = (-$0,80 + $ 2,2 ) / $14,0 = 10%
Answer:
$40,000
Explanation:
The accounting procedure involved in the above is that one picks the lower between the actual interest incurred and the interest computed on the weighted average amount of accumulated expenditures for PPE.
The actual interest incurred on specific construction debt and other borrowings
= $50,000 + $20,000
= $70,000
Since the interest computed on the weighted average amount of accumulated expenditure for the building is $40,000 , the lower between the actual interest incurred and interest on weighted average amount of accumulated expenditure is $40,000, hence will be the capitalized amount.
People will deploy from that bank and move to another bank to remain safe- if they believe the rumor. People usually believe rumors if they hear them enough while some people actually seek evidence and finding the truth vs the lie( or misassumption). For those people they will stay employed with that bank or at least give the bank the benefit of the doubt.
Please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
Answer: An unfavorable variance can be used to detect a drop in estimated income early, and then solutions to the challenge can be identified.
Explanation:
An unfavorable variance is the difference between a company's projected expectation and the actual outcome of a financial activity of the company, where the actual outcome is less favorable than the projected expectation.
The information from an unfavorable variance can help alert a company to a negative outcome early, and the company's leadership can then find ways of solving the cause of the negative outcome.
<h2>Joshua would lose and Sue would benefit from unanticipated inflation.</h2>
Explanation:
- Both Joshua and Sue are associated with fixed pension and fixed interest respectively.
- Now the value of money goes down due to inflation
- So to live as usual, Joshua need to spend some extra money. But considering the fixed income, it's a lose to Joshua
- Whereas Sue is associated with fixed interest of mortgage. She is benefited because, though the inflation has changed the value of all other products, but the fixed interest rate does not change.
- "Fixed-rate mortgage holders are inflation winners", says "Thoma, professor of economics at the University of Oregon"
