Because dividing something is different the subtracting for instance if ten has nothing to divide by (or zero) it falls back to the original number which would be ten
Answer: No direct answer needed because it is already given.
Step-by-step explanation: What I usually do with shapes like this is break it up into two shapes. And for this particular shape, it's relatively easy. I spilt the shape into a rectangle and square and went from there. Since the rectangle width is 3, and can subtract that to 5 and get 2, which tells us that the length and width for the square is 4 and 2. Three times nine is twenty-seven. Add that to 8 (which is the result of 4 times 2) and it equals to 35. Hope that helped! :D
Answer:
From the said lesson, the difficulty that I have been trough in dealing over the exponential expressions is the confusion that frequently occurs across my system whenever there's a thing that I haven't fully understand. It's not that I did not actually understand what the topic was, but it is just somewhat confusing and such. Also, upon working with exponential expressions — indeed, I have to remember the rules that pertain to dealing with exponents and frequently, I will just found myself unconsciously forgetting what those rule were — rules which is a big deal or a big thing in the said lesson because it is obviously necessary/needed over that matter. Surely, it is also a big help for me to deal with exponential expressions since it's so much necessary — it's so much necessary but I keep fogetting it.. hence, that's why I call it a difficulty. That's what my difficulty. And in order to overcome that difficulty, I will do my best to remember and understand well the said rules as soon as possible.
Answer:
The answer is A)-76
Stay Safe,Stay Healthy and Stay Happy
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Observations:
- As x approaches 3 from the left side, f(x) approaches -1.6
- As x approaches 3 from the right side, f(x) approaches 1.6
Conclusion:
- Because the right and left-side limits are not equal to each other, the limit does not exist
- Therefore,
