The destruction of an opponent’s resources is the best description of a scorched earth policy.
Option B
<u>Explanation</u>:
A strategy used by the military of a nation that aims to destroy the assets which might be useful for the opponent or enemy to attack when retreating from a position. This military strategy used becomes a policy which is known as scorched earth policy.
The assets they aims to destroy are usually weapons, any industrial resources, communication sites and vehicles used for transportation. This whole process is carried by the military either in the enemy territory or in its home territory while invading.
True, the supervisor is likely to be disappointed because the report does not provide any feedback which is critical in improving performance. It is vital that as the employee one provides feedback which can in turn be incorporated into the solutions and strategies that are developed in order to propel the organization forward.
The western roman empire was weakened by the high cost of defending the empire.
At its zenith, the Roman empire stretched from the Middle East to the Atlantic Ocean. It being a vast territory, was not easy to govern and due to its vastness the empire faced logistical as well as administrative issues.
Even though they had excellent road systems, the Romans were still not able to effectively manage their territories. They had to struggle in order to maintain enough resources and troops so that they could defend themselves from the rebellions and outside attacks. Emperor Hadrian even constructed a wall in Britain so as to keep the enemies away.
To learn more about the Roman empire, click
brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ4
False, students should get professional opinions from teachers and other adults. Typically they are wiser because of their experiences.
