Answer:
Compare
Step-by-step explanation:
Or relation I believe so...
Answer:
D) -2.14< root10 <|-2.8|
Step-by-step explanation:
the value for -2.14 is as plain as you can see, the negative version of 2.14.
The square root of 10 is 3.16227766.
The lines next to -2.8 is asking for the absolute value of -2.8, or the distance between that number and zero. The distance between -2.8 and 0 is positive 2.8, because distance can't be negative.
The 3 numbers taken from the explanations are -2.14, 3.16, and 2.8. Ranking them from least to greatest would give you -2.14, 2.8, 3.16, or -2.14< root10 <|-2.8|
Do you mean exponential form as in scientific notation or as in prime factorization.
Now matter I will do both.
As in scientific notation.
200*75
=150*100
=1.5*10000
=1.5*10^4
As in prime factorization.
200*75
=2^3*5^2*3*5^2
=2^3 * 3 * 5^4
Do the one your teacher ask for :) Hope it helps!
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.