1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrac [35]
3 years ago
15

Plss help??????????????

Mathematics
1 answer:
xeze [42]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a land bridge

Step-by-step explanation:

fsfsgaggaggagagaggagaggssggsbsbhahahababbabnabababhabahajajjajaj

You might be interested in
2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let p_1 = <u><em>proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.</em></u>

p_2 = <u><em>proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.</em></u>

So, Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1=p_2      {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1\neq p_2     {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>Two-sample z test for proportions;</u>

                          T.S. =  \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = \frac{31}{2823} = 0.011

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = \frac{16}{7765} = 0.002

n_1 = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

n_2 = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }

                                       =  4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

<u>Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.</u>

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which <u>we reject our null hypothesis</u>.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, <u>Margin of error</u> (E) =  1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }

                                        =  1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} }

                                        =  <u>0.00397</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Estimate the sum of 1,256, 379 and 305,986 by first rounding each number to the nearest ten thousand.
KatRina [158]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  1,570,000

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum is approximately ...

  1,260,000 +310,000 = 1,570,000

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

It is a good idea to estimate the error associated with an estimate. Here, both numbers are rounded up by about 4000 each, so the estimate is around 8000 high.

3 0
3 years ago
I need to know how to do the answer and why that’s the anwer
Pavel [41]
Ok so the answer is
4 {x}^{2}

so we multiply numbers that have the same variable

2 {x}^{3} \: \: \times {2x}^{ - 1} \\ \\
multiply 2 x 2

2 \times 2 = 4
then multiply the exponents

x ^{3} \times x ^{ - 1}
multipling like this will look like addition.
{x}^{3} \times {x}^{ - 1} = {x}^{2}
so in other words you could do it like this too
{x}^{3} + {x}^{ - 1} = {x}^{2}
now add the exponent with 4
4 + {x}^{2} = 4x ^{2}

now for the last part
{y}^{3} + {y}^{ - 3} = 0
because -3 and 3 added together make 0
0 + 4 {x}^{2} = 4 {x}^{2}
I hope this help(it looks complicated but it's very easy and I hope I helped you out)
6 0
3 years ago
YA
True [87]

Answer:

I don't understand the question, please be more descriptive

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
sharita does special typing jobs for scientist. she charges 16$ for the first 3 pages and 3$ for each additional page of scienti
liq [111]

Answer: 33 pages

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the total number of pages typed by Sharita.

The cost of the first 3 pages = $ 16

Each additional page cost $3

Total amount paid = $106

since the first 3 pages cost $16 , and x represent the total pages , then the remaining pages will be x - 3

Also , since each additional page cost $3 , the cost of the remaining pages will be 3 ( x - 3)

Combining this , we have

16 + 3 ( x -3 ) = 106

16 + 3x - 9 = 106

7 + 3x      = 106

      3x = 106 - 7

       3x = 99

        x = 33

therefore ,Sonia's paper was 33 pages long

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help???????????????????
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!<br> (Geometry)
    13·2 answers
  • Need help its a test will mark brainllest
    8·2 answers
  • Divide the sum of 8 and 12 by 4
    15·2 answers
  • Need Help Asap ! i’ll mark brainly!!
    13·1 answer
  • 10x^2+15x+5??? Rewrite the question by completing the square factor
    10·2 answers
  • Jonathan, a college business student wants to study how many pages of notes fellow classmates took during a semester for a finan
    11·1 answer
  • An art teacher makes a batch of paint by mixing 8/9 of red paint with another cup of 8/9 paint if she mixes 28 batches how many
    5·1 answer
  • Resultado de (+23) – (-34)
    9·2 answers
  • A jar of M&amp;M’s : 24 brown , 13 orange, 15 red , 10 green , 15 yellow , and 10 blue. Jim is blindfolded and will draw a singl
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!