Answer:
Option B) Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 333
p = 48% = 0.48
Alpha, α = 0.01
Number of women belonging to union , x = 149
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a two-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.273079
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported.
B. Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
By Basic Proportionality Theorem:
Answer:
The system will be inconsistent.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that a system of linear equations has a 3×5 augmented matrix whose fifth column is a pivot column.
Then such a system is not consistent because since the augmented matrix has a pivot in fifth column it means that the new column added to the matrix A will lead to increase in the rank as that of matrix A.
Hence the rank of A and Augment A will not remain same and hence the system will be inconsistent.
d = distance between the two cities
v₁ = average speed while going from chicago to kansas city = 440 knots
t₁ = time taken to travel distance going from chicago to kansas city
time taken to travel distance going from chicago to kansas city is given as
t₁ = d/v₁
t₁ = d/440 eq-1
v₂ = average speed while going from kansas city to chicago = 110 knots
t₂ = time taken to travel distance going from kansas city to chicago
time taken to travel distance going from kansas city to chicago is given as
t₂ = d/v₂
t₂ = d/110 eq-2
Given that :
t₂ = t₁ + 3
using eq-1 and eq-2
(d/110) = (d/440) + 3
d = 440
