Ahh. The chain reaction.
.
You know when you are surfing the web, your parents tell you, or you surf the web, that you see some things like "STOP GLOBAL WARMING?"
.
Yep, I have, at least.
.
Well, let's see about the chain reaction...
.
You see, where does our energy come from?
.
Yes, windmills and solar cells...
.
but also nuclear and power plants, no?
.
The power plants emit carbon dioxide that contribute to global warming.
.
Now, cars do the same. One car may not seems like a lot of carbon dioxide...
.
.
But... this many cars multiplied by 9 trillion times 9 trillion and much more... is...
<span>
</span>.
Well, you know the difference.
.
They contribute to global warming over a period of time, slowly, because they emit carbon monoxide/dioxide.
Answer:
Avogadro’s Number
Avogadro’s NumberIt certainly is easy to count bananas or to count elephants (as long as you stay out of their way). However, you would be counting grains of sugar from your sugar canister for a long, long time. Atoms and molecules are extremely small – far, far smaller than grains of sugar. Counting atoms or molecules is not only unwise, it is absolutely impossible. One drop of water contains about 10 22 molecules of water. If you counted 10 molecules every second for 50 years without stopping you would have counted only 1.6 × 10 10 molecules. Put another way, at that counting rate, it would take you over 30 trillion years to count the water molecules in one tiny drop.
Avogadro’s NumberIt certainly is easy to count bananas or to count elephants (as long as you stay out of their way). However, you would be counting grains of sugar from your sugar canister for a long, long time. Atoms and molecules are extremely small – far, far smaller than grains of sugar. Counting atoms or molecules is not only unwise, it is absolutely impossible. One drop of water contains about 10 22 molecules of water. If you counted 10 molecules every second for 50 years without stopping you would have counted only 1.6 × 10 10 molecules. Put another way, at that counting rate, it would take you over 30 trillion years to count the water molecules in one tiny drop.Chemists needed a name that can stand for a very large number of items. Amedeo Avogadro (1776 – 1856), an Italian scientist, provided just such a number. He is responsible for the counting unit of measure called the mole. A mole (mol) is the amount of a substance that contains 6.02 × 10 23 representative particles of that substance. The mole is the SI unit for amount of a substance. Just like the dozen and the gross, it is a name that stands for a number. There are therefore 6.02 × 10 23 water molecules in a mole of water molecules. There also would be 6.02 × 10 23 bananas in a mole of bananas, if such a huge number of bananas ever existed
An Avogadro's number (6.022 x 10^23) worth of carbon atoms have that exact mass.
12.011 is the MOLAR mass of carbon. It is the mass of 1 mole of carbon. 1 mole of anything contains 6.022 x 10^23 of that thing.
Matter is the stuff been used and mass is the amount of matter
Answer:
I think that it's the temperature
