The appropriate response is sociobiology it is a field of logical review that depends on the theory that social conduct has come about because of advancement and endeavors to analyze and clarify social conduct inside that unique circumstance.
Because they originated from same place and relegion called indians
Answer:
Cultural diffusion
Explanation:
The Cultural diffusion was made possible first through the trade, since the economic activity often impacts many other key areas of life.
<em>In the this case , Buddhism originally from India came through the Silk Road and subsequent trade routes that stretched into China at the time Han Dynasty ruled.</em>
<em>The emperor is told to have request monks to translate the Buddisht texts into Chinese. Later the Emperor decided to built a sanctuary for the monks to live in as they began the translation of Buddhist teachings.</em>
The monks caravans went through the trade outposts preaching the new religion. They reached for Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and further.
Buddhist reached so many people that once , it became the third religion worlwide.
Today it is mostly present in China, Vietnam, Korea, and Japan, to a lesser extent.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
c. the coins and paper money it issues
Explanation:
Currency of a country can as well be called "money" can be regarded
as medium in which in which exchange of good and services is allowed. It is usually issued by government of the country which serve as a face value and it it is known as the means of payment for different transactions been performed by individual or organization. It could be in form of coin or paper. It should be noted that country's currency is the coins and paper money it issues.
