Answer:
Area of the remaining triangle with the villager is 1243.13 m²
Step-by-step explanation:
Triangle ABC is the triangular plot of a villager shown in the figure attached.
Sarpanch requested the villager to donate land which is 6 m wide and along the side AC which measures 132.8m.
Other sides of the plot has been given as AB = 50m and BC = 123 m.
Now area of this land before donation = 
= 
= 3075 square meter
After donation of the land the triangle formed is ΔDBE.
In ΔABC,
tan(∠ABC) = 
= 0.4065
∠ABC = 
= 22.12°
In ΔEFC,
tanC = 
0.4065 = 
CF = 
CF = 14.76 m
Since DE = AC - (CF + AG)
= 132.8 - (2×14.76)
= 132.8 - 29.52
= 102.48 m
Now in ΔDBE,
sin(∠DEB) = 
sin(22.12) = 
DB = 102.48×0.3765
= 38.59 m
Similarly, cos(22.12) =
0.9264 =
BE = 102.48×0.9264
= 94.94m
Now area of ΔDBE = 
= 
= 1831.87 square meter
Area of remaining triangle with the villager = Area of ΔABC - Area of ΔDBE
= 3075 - 1831.87
= 1243.13 square meter
Answer:
i think it`s $35
Step-by-step explanation:
Because 80 divided by 2 = 40 and the problem says to subtract 5 so I believe the answer is $35.
1.) 35,000+6,000+65+13
2.) 25,000+ 16,000+11,000+78
A unit rate where one is in the Denometer, so you would want to divide the bottom by 10.
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
