Answer:
<h2>The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership) is often classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions. A general recognition of a right to private property is found more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for production rather than consumption.[1]</h2><h2 /><h2>A right to property is recognised in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[2] but it is not recognised in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[3] The European Convention on Human Rights, in Protocol 1, article 1, acknowledges a right for natural and legal persons to "peaceful enjoyment of his possessions", subject to the "general interest or to secure the payment of taxes."</h2><h2 /><h2>Definition </h2><h2>Relationship to other rights </h2><h2>History </h2><h2>See also </h2><h2>Notes </h2><h2>References </h2>
<h2>External links</h2>
Janahakavjaiagvahavkabsbsbajbwbakabvaijavabajvsshhshsjsjsjsjajkajsvskskkekekskskwk
Answer: False
Explanation:The short version of the rule is that you cannot be prosecuted more than once for the same crime. It prevents prosecution for the same crime after an acquittal or a conviction, and it also prevents imposing multiple punishments for the same crime.
In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.
<h3>What is Burglary and larceny?</h3>
Burglary is known to be the act of entering a building with the intention to carry out a crime.
Larceny is known too be a theft, and one do not need a structure or building for it.
Therefore, In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.
Learn more about defendant from
brainly.com/question/1259392
#SPJ12
Can you give more information?
