Answer:
4/5 chance
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 4 numbers that fit the rule, 1, 3, 4, 5, since all of them are either odd or greater than 3. There will be a 4/5 chance of picking one.
Answer:
8x+y=1
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps!!
From unit conversion, it is found the following results:
6km ≈ 3.73 mi
2.5 L≈ 0.66 gal
90 lb ≈ 40.82 kg
<h3>
Unit Conversion</h3>
Units of measurement are part of our daily lives. There are different units for area, length, volume, mass, and others. Because of this, it is important to know converting them.
For solving this question you need some information as:
1 km = 0.621371 mi ( unit for length and distance)
1 L = 0.2641722 gallons (unit for volume)
1 lb = 0.453592 kg (unit for mass)
Therefore,
- If 1 km = 0.621371 mi, you will have:
1 km -------- 0.621371 mi
6 km -------- x mi
x= 6* 0.621371
x=3.73 mi
Thus, 6km ≈ 3.73 mi.
- If 1 L = 0.2641722 gallons, you will have:
- 1 L-------- 0.2647122 gal
- 2.5L -------- x gal
- x= 2.5* 0.2647122
- x=0.66 gal
- Thus,
- 2.5 L≈ 0.66 gal.
- If 1 lb = 0.453592 kg, you will have:
- 1 lb-------- 0.453592 kg
- 90 lb -------- x kg
- x= 90* 0.453592
- x=40.82 kg
- Thus,
- 90 lb≈ 40.82 kg
- .
Read more about unit conversion here:
brainly.com/question/13016491
#SPJ1
Answer:
3/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's break it down
1 1/2 is a mixed number
How do we find the fraction form of mixed numbers?
We multiply the denomiator of the fraction part with the integer part and add the current number on the numerator to get your new numerator. The denomiator stays the same.
So in the case of 1 1/2, our new numerator is 2 x 1 + 1 = 3.
Thus, the fraction version is 3/2. Now we need to mulitply this by 1/2
3/2 x 1/2. We just have to multiply the numerator and demoniator
3 x 1 is our numerator
2 x 2 is our denomiator
3/4 cannot be simplified because the numerator and denomiator are both relatively prime (numerator is not divisible by denomiator and vice versa)
I used arm span as the x-axis and height as the y-axis; arm span is the independent variable because height is typically dependent on arm span. Although the opposite could be argued for.
The equation of the line of best fit is y= 12+(7/9)x. To get the slope I used the points (37,39) and (19,25). The slope is therefore 14/18=7/9. The slope represents that height increases by 7/9 inches when arm span increases by 1 inch. The y-intercept 12 represents roughly the height when arm size is very small. I tested the residuals of the points (47,49) and (58,61). The respective predictions are 48.556 and 57.111. The respective residuals are then (49-48.556)=0.444 and (61-57.111)=3.889. It seems that the line models the data well until the x values get larger, where the performance decreases. The line of best fit with its positive slope indicates that there is a positive correlation with arm span and height.
Using the model, a person with arm span 66 inches has a height of 12+(7/9)*66= 63.333 inches. A person with 74 inches height has an estimated arm span of 62*9/7= 79.714 inches.