Answer:
Part a. The graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b. The values in table model a proportional relation.
3.5 minutes per mile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a.
The graph shown in the question representing Janet's data is not a straight line although it passes through the origin.
That is why the rate of change of distance with time is not constant.
Therefore, the graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b.
If we plot the data in the table using distance in miles along the y-axis and time in minutes along the x-axis, then we will get a straight line passing through the origin.
So, the values in the table model a proportional relation.
Now, Tarik's unit rate in minutes per miles will be minutes per mile. (Answer)
Answer:
#6 is 17 days
Step-by-step explanation:
This is how I answered it
1) 2750 = 550 + 125x
2) subtract 550 from each side
2750-550=2200
so the left over equation is:
2200 = 125x
3) divide each side by 125 to get x by itself
2200÷125= 17.6
4) you are left with: x = 17 days
Answer:
If an ordered pair is a solution to an inequality, plug it into the inequality and simplify. If you get a true statement, then the ordered pair is a solution to the inequality. If you get a false statement, then the ordered pair is not a solution.
26 fl. oz. ×4 jars= 104 fl. oz. of spaghetti. ^_^
Any examples?
Or what do you mean?