Answers:
1. Three problems associated with alcohol
a. High blood pressure
b. Liver and kidney disease or cancer
c. Heart diseases
2. “The direct answer to this question is that the government does not decide the legal status of drugs based on scientific assessment of potential for harm.
The ranking of drugs is a very interesting and controversial topic (subject to the apples and oranges problem), but it is simply not the basis by which governments make these decisions. The chart is worth analyzing, but it won't answer the question.
Practically speaking, making alcohol illegal is untenable. It was attempted in the United states in the 1920s, and I am not aware of any credible historians that consider prohibition to have been a success. Alcohol use has been present amongst humankind for millennia. It spans society, race, social class, etc. It does certainly present great potential for harm, individually through the detrimental health effects of abuse, and societally through the impact of impaired decision making, most notably drunk driving.
Despite that, alcohol also clearly provides some benefits that drive some people to use it. Others choose not to use it at all. Many use it without issue, and some develop problems. It is an effective social lubricant. In many cultures it is a common component of traditional celebrations, and in some cultures it is even a component of formal business interactions. It is one of the central rituals in the Catholic church.
Many of the problems associated with alcohol use can be reasonably mitigated without blanket prohibition, i.e. drunk driving and age restrictions. Many of the problems are also solved through basic social structures, in which friends and family address issues independently.
Given the above, the clear follow-on question is why these other, less harmful, drugs are illegal? If alcohol has demonstrated that it is actually more effective to manage these problems with regulation, how are other legalization decisions being made?
Those are much more complicated questions. The brief answers have to do with legacy (less history of widespread human use with other chemicals) and institutional racism.”
This is from the web so find details that will helped you and make sure to paraphrase!!
If helped mark me the brainiest!!
Answer:
D
Explanation:
because we learn the injury it come in differences way
The nurse should administer 10 mg/ml morphine to the client.
<h3>When morphine is administered to the patient?</h3>
Morphine is administered in the case of moderate to severe pain and it is used in the form of tablet also.The case in which the pain is not controlled by the tablet than morphine is administered.
FDA approved morphine sulfate in case of severe to moderate pain and that may be acute or chronic. It is most commonly used in severe pain and ache.
Morphine is used in the treatment of cancer and vaso-occlusive pain as well as in sickle cell crisis.
Therefore,the nurse should administer 10 mg/ml morphine to the client.
Learn more about morphine here:
brainly.com/question/10665765
#SPJ1
Answer:
the answer is (D)
Explanation:
hope this helps
can you relate to the attachment???
Answer:
This serve is legal.
Explanation:
The player on the red team made a hit called the sunrise serve. It is where you place your palms and fingers in a shape similar to a half sun. Then, once you get in position move under the ball and hit above your head aiming over the net.
