To get from the first number to the second number the equation is 10x0.5+5=10
Thereafter the equation to get to the next number is 10x1.0+10=20
Thereafter the equation to get the next number is 20x1.5+15=45
Thereafter the equation to get the next number is 45x2.0+20=110
You can notice the pattern, the first number is what the last number was, you increase the second number by 0.5 and you increase the third number by 5.
Following this pattern to find the last number you do 110x2.5+25. This equation results in the number 300. Now time for the last number. You input 300x3.0+30. The answer results in 930. Therefore, the missing number is 930.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
no because each y value doesn’t increase uniformly
Answer:
coordinate of point b is 12,1 by midpoint formula
Step-by-step explanation:
take mp formula and evaluate by putting value it will give you x again same process then it will give you u
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
