Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
A delay on monsoons can turn around a whole Indian economy!
To generate natural energy that's cheaper and more reliable
Answer: Positive externality
Explanation: Positive externality is the concept in which the service produced and the consumption of that service will provide benefit a third party who is not a part of the process.
While producing fertilizer , it is providing a unintentional benefit to the community surrounding(third party) by keeping the insects away through exerting gases so that they don't cause insect bites or other problem.
Other options are incorrect because negative externalities are negative consequences face by the third party in a process. Comparative externality is related with comparison and pecuniary externality is increment or decrement in market price of service by action of economic actor .
Contributed to the developmentn of representative democracy<span>
</span>
