The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Answer:
is the aggregate of all national markets, seen as linked through mutual economic and trade relations. New trends in trade relations, both between socialist states and between states with differing socioeconomic systems, can now develop and expand within the overall world economy
It was the first time that a Christian force defeated an Ottoman force.
The four major ones are, the Quran, Tawrat, Zabur, and Injil. Hope this helped:)
