A statement that follows with little or no proof required from an already proven statement. For example, it is a theorem<span> in geometry that the angles opposite two congruent sides of a triangle are also congruent. A </span>corollary<span> to that statement is that an equilateral triangle is also equiangular</span>
3*2=6
2 2/3
7*2=14
2 5/7
the answer is B)
good luck
Answer:
6 hours 30 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
morning work=3 hours 45 minutes
afternoon work=2 hours 45 minutes
total hours=?
Here,
3 hours 45 minutes+2 hours 45 minutes
=6 hours 30 minutes
Therefore,Terry Baelett worked 6hours 30 minutes a day.
Answer:
The triangles aren't necessarily congruent. SAS postulate is side angle side, which means that the angle that is congruent must be between the two sides that are congruent. DF is congruent to MN, and DG is congruent to MP. This means, that angle D must be congruent to angle M.
However, we only know that D is congruent to P, not M.
These triangles are not necessarily congruent.
Answer:
Well I only know that the rectangle is 224 because if you multiply 56 by 4 because there are 4 sides you get 224
Step-by-step explanation:
Brainliest sowy I only knew one
