Answer:
Equity Theory
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question this seems to be a clear example of Equity Theory. This theory focuses on determining if the amount of a certain reward or payment that is divided among a set of individuals is fair, and is measured by comparing the contributions that are received by each individual or that set/group. Which seems to be the case in this scenario since June feels that it is unfair that they both do the same work and she is getting paid $1 less than her co-worker.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The highest score is the best option upon concluding the multi-criteria analysis .
<h3>What is a multi-criteria analysis' benefit?</h3>
By evaluating the results, performance, implications, and trade-offs of various policy alternatives, a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) can be used to discover and contrast them. MCA offers a methodical method for supporting complicated decisions in accordance with predetermined standards and goals.
<h3>What is a multi-criteria analysis' benefit?</h3>
Managers can make environmental management decisions that involve trade-offs between a variety of intended management action outcomes with the aid of multi-criteria analysis. Transparent decision modeling begins with clearly specified criteria and hierarchically arranged objectives (particularly when employing qualitative measures).
To know more about multi-criteria analysis visit:
brainly.com/question/14863437
#SPJ4
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
The type of Critical Thinking Questions that Ivory should ask at this point are:
- What are the assumptions?
- what are the issues and the conclusions?
- Are there fallacies in the reasoning?
- How authentic is the data presented?
<h3>What are Critical Thinking Questions?</h3>
Critical Thinking Questions are questions that make inquiries into the veracity of a claim.
They help the evaluator to maintain a logical and rational line of thoughts so that they are able to connect clearly the relationship between facts and ideas.
Learn more about Critical Thinking Questions at:
brainly.com/question/6034421