1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
3 years ago
11

What type of soil would erode the slowest: dry soil or soil that is covered with grass and other plants? Why? PLEASE HELP

Mathematics
2 answers:
Ahat [919]3 years ago
4 0
Soil that has grass/plant. This is because plants have have extensive root systems that can help to "grab onto" soil and keep it clumped together, slowing the process of erosion.

I hope this helps and good luckk u can do thisssss :)
Reil [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

soil covered in grass because the soil is able to hold plenty of water while dry soil is lose and has cracks. lots of cracks.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Please Help<br> What does the missing angle in the triangle measure?
damaskus [11]

Answer:

x = 60

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of the angles of a triangle is 180

95+25 +x = 180

120 +x = 180

Subtract 120 from each side

120+x-120 = 180-120

x = 60

7 0
1 year ago
If f(x) = -4x^2 - 5x + 2, what is f(3) ?
svp [43]
The value should be -49. Hope this helps.
5 0
2 years ago
Sam rolled a die 75 times. On 39 of those rolls, he had a 6. Which statement is TRUE when the probabilities are compared?
svetlana [45]

Answer:

D)The experimental probability is greater than the theoretical probability

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

75 times a die is rolled out of 39 times it got 6

To Find :

Which statement is true?

Solution:

The theoretical probability is given by the ,

Pt=No.of favorable outcomes/Total outcomes

Here favorable is getting 6 on the die

so how many times we can get 6 =1 time

Total outcomes =6

Pt=1/6

Pt=0.1667

Now for

The experimental Probability ,

Pe=Number times that event occur /Total no of trails

Here 39 times we get 6 and total no trails are 75

Pe=39/75

Pe=0.52

Hence we can say that Pe>Pt.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Let X1,X2......X7 denote a random sample from a population having mean μ and variance σ. Consider the following estimators of μ:
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

a) In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

E(\theta) = \mu

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu

So then we conclude that \theta_1 is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu

And then we conclude that \theta_2 is unbiaed too.

b) For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}

And for the second estimator we have this:

Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2

And the relative efficiency is given by:

RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we assume that we have a random sample given by: X_1, X_2,....,X_7 and each X_i \sim N (\mu, \sigma)

Part a

In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

E(\theta) = \mu

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu

So then we conclude that \theta_1 is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu

And then we conclude that \theta_2 is unbiaed too.

Part b

For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}

And for the second estimator we have this:

Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2

And the relative efficiency is given by:

RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}

5 0
3 years ago
Four less than the product of a number and 7 is eight more than that number
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Replace the number with x, then the equation would be:

7x-4=x+8

7x-x=8+4

6x=12

6x/6=12/6

x=2

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 22 POINTS, NEED URGENT HELP
    7·1 answer
  • 12.917 rounded to the nearest ones
    9·2 answers
  • Someone please answer 28 points please answer with the right facts and the explanation thank you
    7·1 answer
  • 4. Find the power set for set A= {a,b,c}.
    15·1 answer
  • Solve for k.<br><br> 18 = 10 + 2k<br><br> k =
    13·1 answer
  • Samantha took out two loans totaling $6000 to pay for her first year of college. She narrowed the maximum amount she could at 3.
    7·1 answer
  • Free Response - calculator may be used. Please help 50 points and brainliest
    13·2 answers
  • Select ALL the correct answers. Select all the expressions that will include a remainder.
    11·2 answers
  • What is the perimeter?<br> No links I’m reporting you if you do.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these procedures is NOT the same as multiplying a whole number by 1,000?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!