Answers:
- False
- True
- True
- False
- True
- False
===============================================
Explanations:
- If we can write a number as a ratio (or fraction) of two whole numbers, then that number is considered rational. The denominator can never be 0. In the case of 6/4, this is a rational number. Therefore, the statement "6/4 is irrational" is false.
- This is a true statement. We cannot write sqrt(2) as a fraction of two integers. The proof of this is fairly lengthy, but one way is to use a proof by contradiction to show that sqrt(2) = a/b is impossible. Since we cannot make sqrt(2) into a ratio of two integers, we consider it irrational.
- This is a true statement. Any terminating decimal is always rational. In this case, 1.3 = 13/10.
- This is false. Any repeating decimal can be converted to a fraction through a bit of work. It turns out that 17.979797... = 1780/99 which makes the value to be rational.
- Any integer is rational. We can write the integer over 1. So something like -16 is the same as -16/1, showing how it is rational. So that's why this statement is true.
- This statement is false because we found true statements earlier.
Answer:
Here is a similar question attached with.
Option (b) that is 2005 is the right choice.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
An equation in slope intercept form.
Where 
= number of years
Comparing from the standard slope intercept form.
y-intercept value 
According to the question the predicted winning speed 
mph
Plugging the value of 
in slope intercept form, we will calculate the (number of years) and then we will add this with 
.
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
Finally the year would be 
So in year 2005 the winning speed is predicted to be 7.16 mph.
Heya!!!
Answer to your question:
angle CDA=angle XYZ
angle DAC= angle YZX
angle ACD = angle ZXY
Hope it helps ^_^
Answer:
1. 9:3
2. 3:1
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it really helps you
The answer will be is the 100.
