The equation for potential energy is denoted as;
Pe = mgh,
where m = the mass, g = acceleration due to gravity, and h = vertical height of the apple. We are given the units for everything but height, which is also what we are solving for. We can then algebraically rearrange our initial equation to solve for h;
h = (Pe)/(mg)
Plug in your given units, and solve!
Post-check:
h = Pe/mg
h = 175J/(0.36g)(-9.81m/s^2)
h = appr. 49.5 meters
Note: Potential energy is a vector quantity; the displacement of the apple will be a negative number, but the distance itself, a scalar quantity, will be the absolute value of that.
Copper because it contains alot of electricity
Answer:
3.066×10^21 photons/(s.m^2)
Explanation:
The power per area is:
Power/A = (# of photons /t /A)×(energy / photon)
E/photons = h×c/(λ)
photons /t /A = (Power/A)×λ /(h×c)
photons /t /A = (P/A)×λ/(hc)
photons /t /A = (680)×(678×10^-9)/(6.63×10^-34)×(3×10^-8)
= 3.066×10^21
Therefore, the number of photons per second per square meter 3.066×10^21 photons/(s.m^2).
Answer:
We need about 8769 meters of wire to produce a 2.6 kilogauss magnetic field.
Explanation:
Recall the formula for the magnetic field produced by a solenoid of length L. N turns, and running a current I:
So, in our case, where B = 2.6 KG = 0.26 Tesla; I is 3 amperes, and L = 0.57 m, we can find what is the number of turns needed;
Therefore we need about 39312 turns of wire. Considering that each turn must have a length of 
, where D is the diameter of the plastic cylindrical tube, then the total length of the wire must be:
We can round it to about 8769 meters.
Answer:
The paper focuses on the biology of stress and resilience and their biomarkers in humans from the system science perspective. A stressor pushes the physiological system away from its baseline state toward a lower utility state. The physiological system may return toward the original state in one attractor basin but may be shifted to a state in another, lower utility attractor basin. While some physiological changes induced by stressors may benefit health, there is often a chronic wear and tear cost due to implementing changes to enable the return of the system to its baseline state and maintain itself in the high utility baseline attractor basin following repeated perturbations. This cost, also called allostatic load, is the utility reduction associated with both a change in state and with alterations in the attractor basin that affect system responses following future perturbations. This added cost can increase the time course of the return to baseline or the likelihood of moving into a different attractor basin following a perturbation. Opposite to this is the system's resilience which influences its ability to return to the high utility attractor basin following a perturbation by increasing the likelihood and/or speed of returning to the baseline state following a stressor. This review paper is a qualitative systematic review; it covers areas most relevant for moving the stress and resilience field forward from a more quantitative and neuroscientific perspective.
Explanation:
