All categories

2 years ago

Parents take their children camping is a gpi or a gdp

Physics

1 answer:

prohojiy [21]2 years ago

8 0

Parents take their children camping increases GPI.

An indicator of economic development and prosperity at the national level is the genuine progress indicator (GPI).
A statistic called the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) has been proposed to replace or augment the gross domestic product (GDP). The GPI incorporates environmental and social aspects that are not captured by GDP in order to more fully account for a nation's well-being, of which only a portion is related to the size of the nation's economy.
The GPI distinguishes between the ideas of societal advancement and economic expansion.
The GPI makes an effort to quantify whether the social and environmental costs of economic output and consumption in a nation are detrimental or beneficial to people's general health and well-being.
From the standpoint of green or social economics, GPI is thought to be a better indicator of growth.

To learn more about GPI visit :

brainly.com/question/26994296

#SPJ9

You might be interested in

Which of the following quantities has the same dimensions as a speed? and why?

saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

the answer is at

Explanation:

Dimension of at = [ LT^-2 ] [ T ]

= [ LT^(-2+1) ]

= [ LT^-1 ]

which is same as dimension of speed.

6 0

3 years ago

Astronomers classify stars according to their (1 point) distance from Earth. color, size, and absolute brightness. age and paral

charle [14.2K]

Answer:

All of the above

Explanation:

Astronomers use all of those measures to classify stars. If you want to look more into classifying stars, check out the Hertzsprung-Russel Diagram. It covers how to identify red giants, main sequence, dwarf stars, ect. Distance from earth is typically measured in light years. The color of stars generally determines how hot they are. (Blue stars are the hottest) Also, the parallax method is used to measure stars that are closer to earth. This method relies heavily on geometry though.

Hope this helped!

8 0

3 years ago

Does the universe need explaining or can it just 'be' there?

Naddik [55]

Recently, We've been discussing this specific topic in my RS class. So, there are many theories to explain the existence of the world such as the Big Bang, Evolution or the Creation story.

Although these are three different ideas, they can still be related or interconnected with one another in some way. For example, George Lemaintre's Big Bang explanation can be linked with the Creation story in ways such as God being present at the Big Bang or even God being the one to allow the Big Bang occur.

Furthermore, God might have created us as apes or monkeys then we evolved to become humans.

In conclusion, the universe couldn't have come to pass just like that, they're must be Scientific or Theological truths to back this up. The only thing is that people have their unique beliefs, according to their religion, culture and childhood background.

4 0

3 years ago

A driver enters a one-lane tunnel at 34.4 m/s. The driver then observes a slow-moving van 154 m ahead travelling (in the same di

navik [9.2K]

Answer:

Ans. B) 22 m/s (the closest to what I have which was 20.16 m/s)

Explanation:

Hi, well, first, we have to find the equations for both, the driver and the van. The first one is moving with constant acceleration (a=-2m/s^2) and the van has no acceletation. Let´s write down both formulas so we can solve this problem.

$X(van)=5.65t+154$

$X(driver)=34.4t+\frac{(-2)t^{2} }{2}$

or by rearanging the drivers equation.

$X(driver)=34.4t+t^{2}$

Now that we have this, let´s equal both equations so we can tell the moment in which both cars crashed.

$X(van)=X(driver)$

$5.65t+154=34.4t-t^{2}$

$0=t^{2} -(34.4-5.65)t+154$ $0=t^{2} -28.75t+154$

To solve this equation we use the following formulas

$t=\frac{-b +\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac } }{2a}$

Where a=1; b=-28.75; c=154

So we get:

$t=\frac{28.75 +\sqrt{(-28.75)^{2}-4(1)(154) } }{2(1)}=21.63s$ $t=\frac{28.75 -\sqrt{(-28.75)^{2}-4(1)(154) } }{2(1)}=7.12s$

At this point, both answers could seem possible, but let´s find the speed of the driver and see if one of them seems ilogic.

$V(driver)=V_{0} +at$ }

$V(driver)=34.4\frac{m}{s} -2\frac{m}{s^{2} } *(7.12s)=20.16\frac{m}{s}$ $V(driver)=34.4\frac{m}{s} -2\frac{m}{s^{2} } *(21.63s)=-8.86\frac{m}{s}$

This means that 21.63s will outcome into a negative speed, for that reason we will not use the value of 21.63s, we use 7.12s and if so, the speed of the driver when he/she hits the van is 20.16m/s, which is closer to answer A).

Best of luck

8 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP MEEEE <br>marking brainliest

aniked [119]

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

Centripetal acceleration formula regarding velocity and radius is,

$a_c=\frac{v^2}{r}$