Answer:
What do Americans think about preferential hiring of women? Has there been a change in the past decade? In 2000(group 1) and 2010(Group 2), the General Social Survey asked participants if they would favor or oppose preferential hiring of women. In 2000, out of 849 respondents, 271 said yes. In 2010, out of 696 respondents, 225 said yes. The 95% confidence interval for p1-p2 is (-0.0509, 0.04273). What would be an appropriate conclusion? O We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2000 is 0.04723. We are 95% confident that the pulation proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2010 is 0.04723. We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2000. O We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2010.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Rate of change = (1350 - 750)/(2010 - 2000) = 600/10 = $60
Initial value = $750
Equation is y = 60x + 750; where y is the amount charged to customer and x is the number of years from 2000.
Answer:
5 people will be left to play
From the following choices, the correct step in evaluating: ∫ cos2 5x dx is 1 - cos 10x / 2dx.
Part A
Let x represent the number of coworkers who prefer the talk news radio.
% prefer the talk news radio,
% will be the percentage that corresponds to coworkers who do not prefer the talk news radio.
Part B
We apply ratio to find x.
Hence number that corresponds to 65% will be greater than 28.
If more, less will divide.
This implies that,
Hence 52 of her coworkers prefer the local news talk station.
