Answer:
Problem 1. <em>(19/2)b + 15</em>
Problem 2. <em>3/16</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Question number 1
5/8 (16b+24) -1/2b =
= (5/8) * (16/1) * b + (5/8) * 24 - (1/2)b
= 10b + 15 - (1/2)b
= (20/2)b - (1/2)b + 15
= (19/2)b + 15
Question number 2
3/4 (16/64 + 12a) -9a =
= (3/4) * (16/64) + (3/4) * 12a - 9a
= (3 * 16)(4 * 64) + (3/4) * (12/1) * a - 9a
= (3 * 1)(4 * 4) + (3 * 12)/(4 * 1) * a - 9a
= 3/16 + (3 * 3)/(1 * 1) * a - 9a
= 3/16 + 9a - 9a
= 3/16
The equivalent expression is 5^(4) * 3^(-10)
<h3>How to determine the equivalent expression?</h3>
The statement is given as:
five raised to the negative second power times three raised to the fifth power end quantity all raised to the negative second power
Rewrite properly as:
(5^-2 * 3^5)^-2
Expand the expression by multiplying the exponents
So, we have:
5^(-2 -2) * 3^(5 *-2)
Evaluate the products
5^(4) * 3^(-10)
Hence, the equivalent expression is 5^(4) * 3^(-10)
Read more about expression at
brainly.com/question/723406
#SPJ1
nice
i think there's supposed to be more to the problem lol
Answer:
The kind of error the researcher has done is a;
Type I error
Step-by-step explanation:
When carrying out hypothesis testing in statistical analysis, a type I error is the type of error said to have occurred when a null hypothesis that is true or correct is rejected which is a false positive conclusion
Given that that sugar box manufacturing company makes the boxes to be 100 g accurately, and that the researcher makes non-random or randomly selects packets which are not filled, the mean of the filled packets is expected to be 100 g making the conclusion for rejection of the null hypothesis a false positive rejection
