Answer:
c
Explanation:
The Production possibilities frontiers is a curve that shows the various combination of two goods a company can produce when all its resources are fully utilised.
The PPF is concave to the origin. This means that as more quantities of a product is produced, the fewer resources it has available to produce another good. As a result, less of the other product would be produced. So, the opportunity cost of producing a good increase as more and more of that good is produced.
So, the PPF exhibits diminishing return. The slope of the PPF is different at different points. this makes the PPF a curve
the budget constraint is a straight line that shows the various combinations of goods a consumer can consume given her income. the budget constraint is a straight line because the slope is constant at each point on the curve
Also, the slope of the budget constraint is the relative prices of the two goods
Based on the information given for Server Company, the machine will be valued a<u>t $42,000 </u>and the machinery account will be credited.
<h3>What would be the value of the machine?</h3>
The machine was sold on January 1, 20X9 and at that point, the accumulated depreciation was $28,000.
The value of the machine was therefore:
= Cost of machine - Accumulated depreciation
= 70,000 - 28,000
= $42,000
Find out more on accumulated depreciation at brainly.com/question/1287985.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.
Explanation:
The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.
Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.
Answer:
"By evolving from a one-size-fits-all approach to one that embraces customer diversity, Moskowitz was able to improve customer experiences with food products from coffee to cola to spaghetti sauce and beyond."
this is what I found online
