Answer:
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.
But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.
Answer:
$870
8.7×10²
Step-by-step explanation:
0.3×($900+$2,000)
0.3×$2900
=$870
Answer:
8 dollar/hr
Step-by-step explanation:
she worked 2 1/2 hrs yesterday and 4 1/4 hrs today
2 1/2 + 4/14
2+4 is 6
and 1/2+1/4 multiply 2 to both numerator and denominator of 1/2 so that the denominator of both fraction is like
it will now become 2/4+1/4 which equals 3/4
This means that she worked total of 6 3/4 hour in all yesterday and today
she is paid 54 dollar
we will need to divide 6 3/4 or written as 6.75 by 54 to find how much she earns per hour
and that would be 8
so she earns 8 dollar per hour.
Known that,
x = z
Also known that,
x + y = 10
Substituting value of x,
z + y = 10
Hence, proved.
Answer:
Yes!
Step-by-step explanation:
8/9 is equal to .888889 while 2/3 is equal to .66667.
