1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
2 years ago
7

What are the similarities between the scientific theory and the human relations theory

Business
1 answer:
Gre4nikov [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The human relations theory (HRT) has evolved in the 1920s and 1930s (Grey, 2009, p.44). Studies by Elton Mayo at the Hawthorne plants of the Western Electric Company were the activator of HRT (Morgan, 1986, p.41). With the help of these studies the enterprise was able to analyze in which way the output of employees change due to diversifying the conditions of employment. Therefor, they established two focus groups which were exposed to different illumination levels. However, analysts noticed that the output in those test groups increased independently from lighting conditions (Pugh, 1990, p.345). Employees felt rather motivated by the particular attention they received. They got the feeling of being something special and not just a factor of producing products (Grey, 2009, p.45). In other words, only the actuality that workers were observed was the reason for this increased productivity. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the workforce can also be motivated by non economical factors. These non economical factors were the basic idea of the HRT (Thompson and McHugh, 2009, p.45). The HRT concerns with the aims, wishes and interests of the employees. Moreover, it supported measures to improve team work, cooperation between management and the workforce, internal communication and social relationships (Slattery, 2003, p.128). The idea was to create a social and friendly business environment to motivate the whole crew. Furthermore the employees should get in contact with each other to achieve a feeling of harmony in the organization. Development and integration of the workforce instead of oppression were further key elements (Slattery, 2003, p.128). These efforts pay off. Productivity and staff satisfaction increased. In addition the employees get a deeper relationship with the enterprise through a humanitarian working atmosphere. As a result, the informal side of the company is at least as fundamental as the formal side (Grey, 2009, p.46).

Explanation:

The third principle is about “cooperation between management and the workers to ensure that the work is done according to the science” (Thompson and McHugh, 2009, p.30). This principle has two aims. On the one hand Taylor wants to achieve that the whole workforce follows the defined processes. On the other hand management and workers should work together. It is essential that both parties realize that it is more profitable for the company and their selves when they work hand in hand. Furthermore this is a key determinant to translate scientific management from theory into practice (Taylor, 1911, p.26).

The relationship between men and management suffered another change referring work sharing. This is the topic of the final principle. In the past the workers themselves were responsible for every part of their job without support of the management. Taylor has changed this proportion. Collecting the whole knowledge of the workers, creating rules and regulations and form a science for each process was no duty for the men (Taylor, 1911, p.37). In other words the management had to ensure that each worker on each day knew exactly what he had to do how he had to do it and in what period of time (Taylor, 1911, p.39). Accordingly, this combination of work sharing and the change of the attitude to work are the factors for success of scientific management.

You might be interested in
A fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The 1st is a stock fund, the 2nd is a long-term government and corporate bond
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

Expected return is: 7.37% and the Standard deviation is: 24.96%

Explanation:

Correlation between fund S&B=0,0667

Standard Deviation of Fund S=41%

Standard Deviation of Fund(B)=30%

E(R) of Stock Fund S=12%

E(R) of Stock Fund B=5%

Covariance between the funds = Standard Deviation of Fund(B) × Standard Deviation of Fund S × correlation between these funds

Cov = 0.41 × 0.30 × 0.0667 = 0.008204

Now minimum variance portfolio is found by applying:

W min(S)=(SDB)^2-Cov(B,S) / ((SDS)^2+(SDB)^2-2Cov(B,S)

W min(S) = 0.338431

W min(B) = 1-0.338431=0.661569

1) E(r)min= 0.338431 × 12% + 0.661569 × 5% = 7.37%

2) Standard Deviation:

SD Min = (Ws^2XSDs^2+Wb^2XSDb^2+2XWsWb*Cov(s,B)^1/2

SDmin=(0.338431^2 × 0.41^2 + 0.661569^2 ×   0.3^2   + 2 × 0.338431 × 0.661569 × 0.008204)^1/2

SDmin=24.96%

8 0
3 years ago
Sheffield Corp. compiled the following financial information as of December 31, 2017:
kramer

Answer:

Explanation:.

3 0
2 years ago
Many hydrothermal mineral deposits of copper, gold, silver, and other metals have been found in the countries bordering the paci
Brums [2.3K]
Qerrtuipkfszb bjgactyesouvpj jcotstick jcyo
7 0
2 years ago
Ayayai Corp. uses the percentage of receivables method for recording bad debts expense. The accounts receivable balance is $200,
Ket [755]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

Amount of which adjusting entry required:

= Amount of uncollectible accounts - Balance in Allowance for uncollectible accounts

= (Balance in accounts receivable × Estimated percentage of accounts receivable to be uncollectible) - Balance in Allowance for uncollectible accounts

= ($200,000 × 4%) - $2,000

= $8,000 - $2,000

= $6,000

Therefore, the adjusting entry is as follows:

Bad debt expense A/c      Dr.  $6,000

To Allowance for uncollectible accounts    $6,000

(To record the bad debt expense)

5 0
3 years ago
C&A sells T-shirts for $20 that cost $5 to produce. The annual holding cost percentage is 10% and the T-shirts turn 25 times
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

B. $0.02

Explanation:

The computation is shown below:

Since the annual holding cost percentage is 10% and the cost of production is $5. So, the holding cost would be

= $5 × 10%

= 0.5

Now if the t-shirts run 25 times a year, so the holding cost would be

= 0.5 ÷ 25 times

= $0.02

Simply we compute the holding cost based on number of times the t-shirt turns in a year

All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Walmart and procter & gamble effectively implemented ________, which allowed for information to flow directly from walmart's
    6·1 answer
  • Skullcandy makes headphones. For 2016 it plans to offer a new product line of wireless headsets to the marketplace. It planned o
    15·1 answer
  • Sarah recently got a 10 percent raise. she now purchases 30 percent more in groceries on a weekly basis. sarah's income elastici
    9·1 answer
  • The U.S. federal government can spend money in a variety of ways. For example, the government could build a major new naval trai
    12·2 answers
  • Merv Grazinski, driving his Winnebago, put it on cruise control to go make coffee. The Winnebago went off the road, turned over
    13·1 answer
  • TONI&GUY is a global hairdressing and education business headquartered in England. It has recently opened salons in Mongolia
    15·1 answer
  • At the end of 2016, Sunland Company has accounts receivable of $653,700 and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,200.
    9·1 answer
  • What is the pricing strategies used to market the product​
    7·1 answer
  • When 100% peak effort from the most skilled and efficient workers is assumed, the direct labor hours required per unit is being
    7·1 answer
  • The present value of $100 paid annually at year end for 20 years at 10% per year is:________.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!