To determine if your hypothesis was correct for future reference
The major difference between a light microscope and a electron microscope would be that with the light microscope, a beam of light is used to focus the image. In an electron microscope, a beam of electrons is used to focus the image. Other notable differences would be with the light microscope, your specimens must be very thin; thin enough for light to pass through them. With the EM, you can place whole specimens that can generate 3D images. There is a much more complex specimen preparation process for the EM, where light microscope slide making is fairly simple in comparison. You can view live and wet specimens with a light microscope but you cannot with the EM because an EM requires specimens to be placed in a vacuum chamber. Lastly, the EM is very large and complex to operate, where the light microscope is somewhat portable. Hope this helps!
This is because of B. Their cells are in direct contact with the environment.
✯Hello✯☆(❁‿❁)☆
↪ I think its from 6%-10% of living organisms today that will become fossils
↪ Animals have a less likely chance since they have parts that are difficult to become fossils (like teeth, bones)
↪ Plants may decompose and go underwater to be used as Crude Oil
↪ Most of the population are humans, which will be extremely hard to fossilise
HOPE THIS HELPS
★ВУёヽ(‘∀`○)ﾉВУё☆
❤Gianna❤
Answer:independent variable
Explanation:
