Answer:
Answer is explained in the attachment.
Explanation:
Nobody really knows the real answer to this
The producer MAKES the product, and sells it to retailers. The consumers buy the products from the retailers.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
Answer:
can return the bracelet and get her money back
Explanation:
Minors have a restriction on the products that they can. To purchase these products they must have consent of their parent or guardian.
An identity card is required to determine the age of the buyer to avoid wrong sales to minors.
Items prohibited from sale to minors include: alcohol, tobacco, petrol, offensive weapons, intoxicating substances, and expensive jewelry.
So in this scenario since due diligence was not carried out by the store to check Heather's age on purchase, she can return the diamond bracelet and get back her money.
This was an illegal sale.
